› › ›

Creating your Blueprint is just the start.

A 12-month rhythm to turn the MEDDICC Blueprint into the way your team thinks, coaches, and operates — consistently. Built for Sr Revenue Leaders & Enablement teams.

70%+of methodology initiatives fail — leaving an un-activated resource behind.
average exposures a person needs to contextualise and operate with new best practice.
#1lever to activate your Blueprint: your leaders, coaching in real cadences.
01 · The activation thesis

Activation isn't a launch event. It's a system.

The journey to maturity is, in essence, about ensuring the best practice captured in your Blueprint is represented in the behaviour of your team, consistently. It's a systemised approach built on three pillars.

1 Reinforcement

Enablement Calendar

Targeted reinforcement of the Blueprint. Full enablement in the first 3 months; targeted thereafter, based on gaps seen in the field.

Why it matters: One and done never works. On average people need to be exposed to something 7 times to contextualise it and properly operate with it.
2 The human context

Coaching Cadence

MEDDPICC as a common language, in your specific business context, lives in communication. The Blueprint becomes a resource to empower effective coaching based on observations made in cadences — Deal Reviews, Pipeline Reviews, Forecast Calls and 1:1s.

Why it matters: There is nothing that accelerates bridging the gap between theoretically understanding MEDDPICC and operating with it as second nature faster than situational coaching on real-world execution.
3 The tech context

Systems

The data side of everything your team does — CRM, conversation intelligence, and the gaps surfaced by tech. Your stack or ours.

Why it matters: When systems reflect best practice, you get what everyone's after: data-driven, best-practice behaviour.
What you're activating

The MEDDICC Blueprint.

Before you activate it, here's what the Blueprint is — and what a completed one looks like.

The Pain
“MEDDPICC Masterclass is completed, now what?”
  • Adoption stalls.
  • Forecasts are still inaccurate.
  • Execution is inconsistent across teams.
The Creation
MEDDPICC for your context
  • Each MEDDPICC element in your context.
  • Connected to your sales stages.
  • Underpinned with actionable plays to drive results.
The Gain
Turn knowledge into measurable results
  • Clarity & Consistency on GTM execution.
  • Improved predictability.
  • Increased sales velocity & Performance Distribution.
📣

Definitions

MEDDPICC elements defined in the context of your company. No grey area or debate, just clarity.

Customized

In line with the Value, Stakeholders and Process your business covers.

Sales Process Aligned

Setting the standards of what's required per stage, giving leaders and individuals clarity to operate and collaborate with.

Plays

Actionable plays on your and MEDDICC's industry best practice: making best practice, common practice.

Activation

Creation, skill-set building for your team and activation through 3 live sessions based on your Blueprint.

Why MEDDICC Blueprint?

Accelerated time-to-value

Bridging the gap between knowing and doing MEDDPICC.

Personalized

For your business context.

Expert-Led

Facilitated by a leading MEDDPICC expert.

🔒 Anonymised worked example — company, customer & competitor names replaced with placeholders.

Common misconceptions about MEDDPICC

“It's a linear sales process.”The elements aren't steps you must complete in order — they're interlocking elements you can address as needed.
“You can nail it in a single call.”This isn't BANT. Each element often unfolds over multiple interactions.
“It's only for large enterprise deals.”MEDDPICC can be adapted relative to the complexity of your deal, big or small.
“It's just a leadership accountability tool.”Leaders can track deal health with it, but it's fundamentally your personal selling methodology — your best tool for consistent execution.
“All implementations are equal.”Many teams stop at basic qualification. A robust, common GTM language uncovers blind spots and drives a coordinated system of action.

The eight elements

MetricsThe quantifiable measures of value that your solution can provide.
Economic BuyerThe person with the overall authority in the buying decision.
Decision CriteriaThe various criteria by which a decision to purchase your solution will be judged.
Decision ProcessThe series of steps that the buyer will follow to make a decision.
Implicate the PainThe pain/problem the customer faces that your solution can help them solve.
CompetitionAny person, vendor, or initiative competing for the same funds or resources you are.
Paper ProcessThe steps that follow the Decision Process — from Decision to signature.
ChampionA person with power, influence and credibility in the customer's organisation, working with you to make progress.

How to use this Blueprint

For ICs

  • Align on repeatable pain use cases and get to the gain with your solutions to structure discovery and reach implications.
  • Select and use M1s in Discovery to build credibility, prompt data sharing, and build the M2 subsequently.
  • Proactively influence the winning Decision Criteria.
  • Use the Stakeholder Profiles to identify, build and qualify Champions and Economic Buyers.
  • Select the right Competition plays for the competitive landscape you're in.
  • Ensure traction by proactively creating alignment in the Decision and Paper Process.

For Leaders

  • Empower teams with proven best practice, documented for repeatable use across MEDDPICC.
  • Coach on gaps — this Blueprint sets the standards; the gaps it uncovers is where you coach towards action.
  • Use Exit Criteria as the bridge between qualification and methods — the gap informs the action and the method.
  • Reference and commit to the right actionable plays with your team to create repeatable impact — making best practice, common practice.

Implicate the Pain

Pain is the fuel that drives deals. Without it, there is no urgency. Your job is to Identify it, Indicate its cost, and Implicate the consequences.

Level 1

Identify

Surface-level pain.

Level 2

Indicate

How the pain measures.

Level 3

Implicate

The bad that comes from it.

Pain database

Grouped into three value categories — the worked example below is from a risk/insurance vertical.

Economic
  • Total Cost of Risk — we don't know what risk is actually costing us.
  • Claim Frequency — filing many claims and seemingly unable to get it down.
  • Claims Leakage — losing money on claims we can't see or manage properly.
  • Insurance premiums — premiums rise as we can't show underwriters our risk story.
Efficiency
  • Manual Data Entry — too much time entering and reconciling data instead of managing risk.
  • Multiple Risk Platforms — risk data across disconnected systems, no single source of truth.
  • Data Collection Cycle Time — by the time data is ready, the window to act has passed.
  • Time to unified Risk Review — a complete picture takes too long and happens too rarely.
  • Average claim cycle time — claims take too long to close.
Risk
  • Compliance Posture — no real-time visibility into where we stand on compliance.
  • Inability to anticipate — we can't see risk building until an incident has happened.
  • Recordable Incident Rate Exposure — incidents we can't adequately track, prevent, or defend.
  • High Severity Incident Rate & Reputation — high-severity incidents with no way to predict or prevent the next one.
Pain holistically
  • 1 — Unable to collect all data required. Without complete data on incidents, claims or exposures, we can't analyse, respond accurately, or make decisions that improve the business.
  • 2 — Data exists, but it's disparate. Data lives across multiple systems but isn't connected, so analysis is incomplete and decisions are made in silos.

Pain-to-Gain frameworks

Use these in Discovery to structure your conversations and quantify implications.

Total Cost of Risk (TCOR) — Economic
Without Sterling Cooper

Risk costs spread across disconnected systems. Claims, premiums, retained losses and admin overhead tracked separately — no single number. TCOR is calculated retrospectively, too late to influence decisions.

With Sterling Cooper

All cost components consolidated in one platform. TCOR is visible in real time. Leadership can benchmark, trend, and act — turning cost visibility into programme strategy.

Insurance premiums — Economic
Without Sterling Cooper

Renewal arrives with fragmented loss data and no coherent risk narrative. Underwriters hold rate; brokers lack evidence to negotiate. Premiums rise year on year without clear justification.

With Sterling Cooper

Clean, trended loss data ready before the renewal window. A documented risk-improvement story goes to market. Underwriters see a managed programme. Rate pressure eases.

Multiple Risk Platforms — Efficiency
Without Sterling Cooper

Risk data sits in 6+ platforms, none connected. Every report requires manual extraction and reconciliation. IT maintains integrations that constantly break. No single version of truth exists.

With Sterling Cooper

One platform replaces the patchwork. Incidents, claims, audits and policies in one place. Reporting is instant, IT overhead drops, decisions are made from one source.

Inability to anticipate — Risk
Without Sterling Cooper

Risk leaders are reactive by default. No connected leading indicators — near-misses, audit findings and inspection results live in silos. The next incident is invisible until it happens.

With Sterling Cooper

Leading indicators aggregated into a live risk profile. Patterns identified before they become events. Risk leaders move from explaining incidents to preventing them.

Metrics — M1, M2, M3

M1s

Where we've done it before

Proof points used in Discovery to earn the right to ask the questions.

M2s

How we'll do it for you

The quantified business case, built with the customer.

M3s

Our mutual goals

Success defined together, owned through to going live.

Existing M1s — getting the right to ask the questions

Customer names anonymised to industry descriptors; outcomes retained.

Pain we solveAnonymised proof point (M1)
Total Cost of RiskIndustrial manufacturer — 50% YoY decrease in workers' comp claims + fewer reportable injuries (RMIS). Food & beverage distributor — 57% reduction in WC incurred amount over 6 months (EHS).
Claim FrequencyFood & beverage distributor — 57% reduction in WC incurred amount over 6 months. Industrial manufacturer — 50% YoY WC claims decrease.
Manual Data EntryGlobal manufacturer — cut manual work by 50%, freeing time for strategic work (GRC).
Multiple Risk PlatformsMaterials company — eliminated $40k spend via consolidation (RMIS).
Time to unified Risk ReviewGlobal manufacturer — GRC workshops completed in half the time, 140 stakeholders across 120 risks.
Compliance PostureLarge municipality — 75% reduction in state penalties via automated reporting (RMIS).
Recordable Incident RateFood manufacturer — 50% reduction in TRIR.
High Severity Incident & ReputationHospitality group — $200k workers' comp claim savings (EHS). Food & beverage distributor — 57% reduction in WC incurred amount.
Insurance premiumsMunicipality — $114k premium savings via analytics-based negotiation (RMIS).

Metrics qualification questions

Total Cost of Risk“When your CFO asks for your total cost of risk today, how do you calculate that — and how confident are you in the number?”
Claims Leakage“Industry forensic audits find leakage averaging ~10–11% of gross claims cost in organisations without unified visibility — do you have a sense of where you'd sit?”
Manual Data Entry“If you had to estimate what percentage of your risk team's time goes to collecting, entering and reconciling data vs. actually analysing it — what would you say?”
Data Collection Cycle Time“From the moment a risk event occurs to the point where you have clean, decision-ready data — how many days does that typically take?”
Recordable Incident Rate“What would a 30–50% reduction in TRIR mean for your WC costs, insurance premiums and regulatory exposure?”

Build the M2

Insurance premiums — quantified example
Quantified pain (without)

Premiums increased 12%, 9% and 14% over the last 3 renewals. Submissions built on incomplete, unverified loss data — no trend narrative, no demonstrated improvement. On a $1M annual premium base, that's $350,000 in avoidable premium growth over 3 years with no mechanism to change the trajectory.

Quantified gain (with)

Premiums trend down 10–15% as loss data is consolidated, trended, and presented as a verified improvement story. On a $1M base, a 12% reduction = $120,000 saved annually — and the $350,000 lost becomes the cost of inaction, not the new normal.

Differentiated Decision Criteria

The key to Decision Criteria is two things: pro-activity and 3-dimensionality — across Technical, Economic and Relationship.

Technical
  • Single platform — all risk data in one system.
  • Low-code self-service configuration — no IT dependency.
  • Open API integrations — connects to HR, ERP, and carrier systems.
  • Mobile incident capture — real-time data from the field.
  • Benchmarking — industry and vertical benchmarking capabilities.
Economic
  • TCO-driven economics — full platform cost vs. point-solution stack.
  • Build vs. Buy — proven total cost of ownership vs. hidden costs of fragmentation.
  • Quantifiable ROI — 10–15% premium reduction, 50%+ analyst time recovered.
  • Time to value — fast configuration via portal and marketplace.
Relationship
  • Outcome-focused M3 metrics — success defined from day one.
  • #1 CSAT/NPS (independent analyst) — long-standing track record.
  • 98% retention, 112% NRR — customers stay and grow.
  • Named CSM with dedicated support — issues resolved in hours, not months.
  • Implementation expertise and peer references available.

Top plays: Value

Play

Using M1s for discovery

Select an M1 from research ahead of the meeting to open the door: “Typically, risk teams in your space see premiums creep up 8–15% at renewal — not because risk got worse, but because they couldn't show a clean data story. How does that land?” You don't have to be exactly right — it opens the door to being corrected and onto the M2 track.

Play

Dc pro-activity

Position the winning Decision Criteria proactively, ask for feedback and document them in your follow-up. Dc underpins your Champion's ability to defend your proposition when you're not in the room — and protects you against competition.

Play

Value Pyramid

Build a Value Pyramid to strategically align with the business — from board-room context down to the obstacles and needs in their way. Run it to show up as professionals with a proactive point of view.

Persona database

Having EB engagement = 52% higher win-rate

Typical roles

  • Economic Buyer: CFO, COO, CLO / General Counsel, Chief Risk Officer.
  • Champion: VP / Director of Risk, Director of Safety, Director of Enterprise Risk.

Check in every deal

  • How does our proposed Champion qualify against the 3 traits of a Champion?
  • What is our EB status — Unknown, Identified, or Engaged?

Champion overview

Your internal seller — power, influence, and a vested interest in your success. They sell for you when you aren't in the room. Champions are built, not found. Tested across all 3 traits: power & influence, willingness/ability to sell for you, and vested interest.

Things Champions do
  • Share pain openly — clarify acute business and personal pain.
  • Coach to win — the inside line on red tape, EB priorities and what to say.
  • Provide access to information — loss runs, historical data, system logins.
  • Provide EB access — earned, not given.
  • Sell internally — built by you, on their experience of the pain.
Things Champions don't do
  • Withhold insights on decision processes, pain or competitor movements.
  • Negotiate prematurely.
  • Block access to information needed to win.
Things Champions care about
  • Personal reputation — looking like a hero with a winning strategy.
  • Trust & validation — relying on top CSAT and retention to validate their choice.
  • Making an impact — modernising and proving ROI to the CFO.
  • Platform efficiency — eliminating manual work without IT dependency.
Things Champions don't care about
  • Internal red tape that slows progress.
  • Deep technical nuance — rely on you to guide them.
  • Short-term cost wins over capability and service.

Economic Buyer overview

The ultimate decision-maker who controls the budget and has authority to sign. They have the power to say yes when others say no — and no when others say yes. Focused on risk mitigation, outcomes and commercial value over technical features.

Things EBs do
  • Command internal teams — push Legal/Procurement to accelerate the paper process.
  • Focus on performance metrics — top-line revenue, NCA targets.
  • Treat relationships as partnerships — outcome-driven, root-cause focused.
  • Demand transparency — clear about goals and where vendors miss.
Things EBs don't do
  • Get in the weeds of day-to-day minutiae.
  • Act overly accommodating — they'll play hardball.
  • Hand over transparency without you earning it.
Things EBs care about
  • Confidence & risk — can you prove ROI to the CFO and board?
  • Completion — speed to acquisition and hitting annual goals.
  • Commercial value — ROI of “Build vs. Buy”.
  • Performance & outcomes — revenue and net-new metrics.
Things EBs don't care about
  • Costs in isolation — they evaluate cost against value.
  • Building friendships — straight to business.
  • The blame game — focus on root causes.

Competition

Competition is any person, vendor or initiative competing for the same funds or resources — split into four categories: Rivals, Other Initiatives, Self-Build, Inertia. Every deal has a competitor — even if that competitor is “do nothing.”

Up to 60% of deals end in inertia · 77% find buying complex/difficult · ~20% add real value through preparation & Champion alignment
1

What are we competing against?

Not just rivals — anything fighting for the same resources, including inertia.

2

Who is championing our competition?

No Champion, no deal — how does your Champion compare to the competition's?

3

Lock in your Dc

Competitive differentiation lives in Decision Criteria — influence, document and lock in.

Competitor names anonymised; positioning retained.

CategoryRival (anonymised)Where they're strongWhere we win
Safety / EHSEHS incumbent · SMBPricing + product for chemical / LMSNPS track record, EHS depth, service quality; one platform, one codebase
Safety / EHSEHS platform · Mid / EntBreadth of offering, incident mgmt, brand awarenessEnterprise reputation, compliance, oil/gas/pharma; platform depth beyond light-touch
Risk / RMISAI-first claims platformClaims-shop reputation; TPA/carrier/risk pools; AI-firstDeeper RMIS capabilities; foundational LLM vs. AI wrapper
Risk / RMISGRC-focused platformGRC depth — competes on enterprise riskFull RMIS breadth — the GRC player doesn't cover operational risk
Risk / RMISLow-cost RMIS · Gov / CanadaLow-cost player; government & Canadian market focusDeeper RMIS + foundational LLM; broader ICP coverage
Risk + SafetyIntegrated RMIS platformSelf-config ease of use; GRC as coreIntegrated platform depth, customer service, ease of use; mobile UX on one codebase
Risk + SafetyMid-market RMISTime to value; light implementations in low-end mid-marketProduct-dev velocity; transparent pricing vs. big upcharge

Top plays: Stakeholders

Play

Champion Deck

The second trait of a Champion is the ability and willingness to sell on your behalf — equipping them with a Champion deck is the most effective way. Ideally in their branding, covering pain, gain and unique decision criteria. V1 by the seller; V2 from the Champion's feedback. Not willing to work on it with you? That's qualification too.

Play

EB multi-thread — no ask

When identifying your proposed EB, request a senior leader reach out early. The opening message is an introduction and an insight of value — no ask in return. Keep updating the proposed EB as the cycle progresses, so by the time you ask for engagement you've raised your chances (EB engaged = 52% higher win-rate).

Play

Stakeholder-level pain

When pain sounds the same for all stakeholders, you haven't gone far enough. Take the company-wide pain (all 3 levels) and personalise it to each stakeholder. Requesting their individual feedback demonstrates curiosity and builds rapport.

Decision & Paper Process

The Decision Process

The “how” in which the customer is going to make their decision — the business process.

The Paper Process

The series of steps that follow the Decision Process — from Decision to signature. The legal process.

Pro-activity here defines time to close.

Process pro-activity by stage

Early

Position & qualify

Position best practice (who, what, when). Qualify history of buying similar solutions. NDA positioning.

Mid

Confirm & document

Confirm who/what/when. Separate tech validation and RTS. Introductions to Legal/Finance requested. Implementation plan created.

Late

Lock in

Paper Process confirmed/triangulated. Engagement with Legal/Finance existing. Implementation plan locked in.

Three moves to uncover the process: ask about previous experiences (let your Champion story-tell how prior buying journeys took place), get articulation of how decisions get made (aligned to strategic goals), and ask for their version of the perfect process — what, who & when — then listen for gaps.

Go-Live Plan

Replaces the seller-oriented “close plan”. It focuses on what the customer cares about — going live. Built to be flexible and accessible, with collaboration and built-in audit trails, it becomes a basecamp for all deal-related communication, living between you and your Champion. A Champion actively engaged with the Go-Live Plan is a great signal.

Negotiation — proactive paper process

  • Start early with your GLP — initiate procurement and legal steps early; security reviews, infosec questionnaires and MSA redlines can take months.
  • Understand timelines & signatories — “What is your standard legal cycle? Who exactly must sign? What priority is this project?”
  • Anticipate price pressure — procurement will push for concessions; don't negotiate until you're the preferred solution.
  • Get to “No” quickly — prioritise asks, state you can't do everything, stop the music.
  • Use a give-to-get framework — discount = longer term or more product; less term = higher cost; no implementation fee = references, case studies, brand usage.
  • Kick off with GLP + Metrics — recap your GLP with procurement: timelines, cost of delay, business case.
  • Escalate if off-track — loop in your Champion and EB immediately to apply pressure; tie back to impacts on their timeline.
  • Don't negotiate single points — ask for everything before you negotiate anything.

Top plays: Process

Play

The Go-Live Plan

Ensures efficient, effective completion of the mutual evaluation — navigating the process of buying your solution and the value going live. It lives between you and your Champion; active engagement is a great signal.

Play

The biggest mistake I made

We've all had a deal slip because we didn't anticipate a step, overlooked a stakeholder, or engaged Legal too late. Story-telling how this happened before opens willingness to collaborate on uncovering what's required. Professional sellers, not buyers.

Play

Champion Huddle

A recurring slot where you and your Champion talk through deal progress, with the Go-Live Plan as the basis. A Champion committing to a weekly cadence is a great qualification signal and a powerful mechanism to keep the deal on track.

MEDDPICC × your sales process

What good looks like for each element, mapped to the stages of the sales process. This is the backbone leaders coach against.

ElementQualificationNeeds AnalysisEvaluationSelectedNegotiationClosed Won
MetricsIntroduce M1 stories to prompt spec sharingBuild M2Present M2 ROI vs. qualification costUse M2 to defend pricingTrack initial order against M3 (goal)Owns the journey to M3 — vested interest
Economic BuyerMap org chart; identify proposed EBUnderstand EB goals; let Champion coachMulti-thread to unlock EB engagementEB GO for initial order vs. proposed pricing/eDcEB exposure to initial outcomeEB GO for expansion
Decision CriteriaProbe winning DcSurround M2 with winning DcLock in Dc against Pain/GainEnsure 3-dimensional to prevent price battleOutcomes connected back to Dc as dependenciesDc documented for expansion
Decision ProcessUncover via incumbent buying historyValidate DP connects to Champion's vested interestTrack progress via GLPEnsure it extends and is documented for expansionCovered in GLP, too
Implicate PainUncover surface pain (i1)Clarity on how pain measures (i2)Drive implication (i3) at company levelDrive urgency, personalised per stakeholderValidate pain vs. gaini3 at scale to drive expansion urgency
ChampionIdentify proposed ChampionBuild / test — engagement & feedbackCo-build proposition; access to info & stakeholdersGuides through Decision Process — qualifies on all 3 traitsPro-actively pulls through Paper ProcessMonitor for migration sabotage; document for upsell
CompetitionIdentify incumbent or inertiaChampion coaching on how to winCompetitive differentiation locked in via DcOutcomes vs. competition articulatedDocument for future renewals
Paper ProcessUncover via buying history; ensure NDAValidate DP to signatureLock in SLAs, pricing, qualityShare onboarding comms in MEDDPICC languageMap M3 progress for sign-off / expansion

MEDDPICC scoring — what each colour means

The standard the Blueprint sets, expressed as a Red / Amber / Green scale per element. This is what surfaces in your CRM and what leaders coach against.

Red — gap Amber — in progress Green — best practice
Metrics
No M1 positioned / consensus
M1 consensus, no M2 lock-in
M2 locked in with Champion
Economic Buyer
No EB identification and engagement
EB identified, no engagement
EB engaged, built to give the EB GO
Decision Criteria
No Dc identified or influenced
Some initial Dc position, no lock-in
Dc influenced across all categories, documented and locked in
Decision Process
Key steps and owners not identified; GLP not initiated
Steps and stakeholders identified, GLP not launched yet
All items assigned, GLP documented, dates agreed, milestones tracking
Paper Process
No visibility or action yet
Paper Process confirmed by Champion
Champion & EB help pull through Paper Process if blockers arise
Implicate the Pain
Pain identified (surface level)
Pain indicated (how it measures) for various stakeholders
Pain implicated and surfaced in all resources and meetings to keep urgency high
Champion
No proposed Champion
Proposed Champion, aligned to typical persona
Champion built and tested against all 3 traits
Competition
No visibility on what we're competing against
All things competing for resources clear; building differentiation with Champion
Differentiation locked in with adopted Dc, underpinning the M2 business case
Built with MEDDPICC · Powered by Discipline · Driven by Data
Pillar 01 · Reinforcement

The Enablement Calendar.

“Repetition is the mother of learning, the father of action — which makes it the architect of accomplishment.” Click any month to see the theme, the seller activity, and the manager activity. Tick it off as you run it.

0 of 3 sessions run
Pillar 02 · The human context

Coaching: observe, give feedback, level up.

Enablement teaches at a theoretical level. Context-based coaching is the accelerator. People change behaviour based on what gets inspected — and where clear, actionable feedback is given.

The Cadence Stack

Four real-world context lenses where coaching happens.

(Bi)Weekly

Deal Trust

Lens · Gaps & actions

Preparation goes out beforehand. Go deep on gaps, lock down actions with a clear what, who and when — and ensure MEDDPICC language is used.

Weekly

1:1

Lens · Professional development

Converse about a single MEDDPICC element that stands out as a challenge, grounded in real-life context.

Bi-weekly

Pipeline Review

Lens · Hygiene & coverage

Inspect required MEDDPICC coverage, aligned to your sales stages. Stage- and process-based.

60 min

Forecast Call

Lens · Commit vs. evidence

Pressure-test advanced deals against MEDDPICC to improve predictability — and early-mid cycle deals for cautiousness.

The coaching flywheel

Observe → Coach → Execute & observe again.

For Sr Leadership & Enablement, observation and feedback become a flywheel that levels up how your frontline leaders use MEDDPICC — and their overall effectiveness as leaders.

1
›››

Observe

MEDDPICC in use, in real cadences. Attend or listen to a recorded call — one team or leader, per week.

Result: clear, actionable insights to feed back to call participants.

2
›››

Coach

Make stakeholders aware of something they can't see yet. Share clear feedback and confirm it's received — written follow-up recommended.

Result: an agreed improvement, with a when.

3

Execute

Verify execution. Re-coach if missed. The behaviour repeats under inspection.

Result: a new behaviour → newly formed habits.

Pillar 03 · The tech context

Systems: closing the loop.

Systems aren't the holy grail — but they're vital to unlocking the initiative. When systems are in tune with observing and executing best practice, you get data-driven, best-practice behaviour.

CRM — the foundational data layer

Empower MEDDPICC adoption rather than adding manual workload. Open text fields alone won't cut it.

MEDDPICC fields

Dedicated opportunity-level fields. Give clear guidance, pull from a database, integrate with other tech — avoid 100% manual entry.

Gap surfacing & scoring

The Blueprint informs what's required per stage. Work with RevOps so gaps and opportunity health are obvious in the system.

Resources linked

Bridge CRM and selling resources (Go-live plans, Champion decks). Set the standard for where resources live and how they flow back centrally.

Leading indicators

Score MEDDPICC elements across the board. Start with Champion & Metrics, then Economic Buyer — watch it evolve QoQ.

Call recording & conversation intelligence

Capture real conversations for real-world context — and eradicate manual data entry.

Auto MEDDPICC data entry

Conversations captured in MEDDPICC context in real time, into your system of record. Users correct where needed.

Summarising ahead of cadences

The best deal reviews come from preparation. Automate much of it and raise the standard.

Coaching insights

From patterns and observed conversations, surface actionable, specific insights.

Blueprint-based suggestions

The Blueprint captures what good looks like per stage and element — integrate it so the system suggests next actions too.

03 · Measurement

The Behaviour Change Curve.

You can't improve what you don't measure. Where is your team today? Pick a stage to see what it looks like, the leading indicators to watch, and the risk to avoid.

Leading & lagging — watch both

Leading indicators (coaching cadence held, field completeness, call-tag volume) tell you whether the system is running. Lagging indicators (win rate, cycle length, forecast accuracy, slip rate) tell you whether it's working. Track both, every quarter, and report them together — cause and effect.

04 · Your operating rhythm

The Enablement Leader's checklist.

Your rhythm, codified. Run this and the Blueprint stays sharp. Drop it and adoption decays in 90 days. Tick items off — your progress is saved in this browser.

Questions

Frequently asked.

Run the sessions with us

Want a partner to run the activation?

Enablement & Revenue Leadership typically run these sessions — optionally with the MEDDICC team as an additional service. Tell us where you are and we'll help you build the rhythm.

  • Facilitate the first-3-months Blueprint enablement sessions
  • Coach your frontline managers on live cadences
  • Wire MEDDPICC into your CRM & conversation intelligence
  • Build your leading/lagging scorecard

Ready when you are.

No forms — you're already known in mOS. One click reaches the MEDDICC team.