A 12-month rhythm to turn the MEDDICC Blueprint into the way your team thinks, coaches, and operates — consistently. Built for Sr Revenue Leaders & Enablement teams.
The journey to maturity is, in essence, about ensuring the best practice captured in your Blueprint is represented in the behaviour of your team, consistently. It's a systemised approach built on three pillars.
Targeted reinforcement of the Blueprint. Full enablement in the first 3 months; targeted thereafter, based on gaps seen in the field.
MEDDPICC as a common language, in your specific business context, lives in communication. The Blueprint becomes a resource to empower effective coaching based on observations made in cadences — Deal Reviews, Pipeline Reviews, Forecast Calls and 1:1s.
The data side of everything your team does — CRM, conversation intelligence, and the gaps surfaced by tech. Your stack or ours.
Before you activate it, here's what the Blueprint is — and what a completed one looks like.
MEDDPICC elements defined in the context of your company. No grey area or debate, just clarity.
In line with the Value, Stakeholders and Process your business covers.
Setting the standards of what's required per stage, giving leaders and individuals clarity to operate and collaborate with.
Actionable plays on your and MEDDICC's industry best practice: making best practice, common practice.
Creation, skill-set building for your team and activation through 3 live sessions based on your Blueprint.
Bridging the gap between knowing and doing MEDDPICC.
For your business context.
Facilitated by a leading MEDDPICC expert.
Pain is the fuel that drives deals. Without it, there is no urgency. Your job is to Identify it, Indicate its cost, and Implicate the consequences.
Surface-level pain.
How the pain measures.
The bad that comes from it.
Grouped into three value categories — the worked example below is from a risk/insurance vertical.
Use these in Discovery to structure your conversations and quantify implications.
Risk costs spread across disconnected systems. Claims, premiums, retained losses and admin overhead tracked separately — no single number. TCOR is calculated retrospectively, too late to influence decisions.
All cost components consolidated in one platform. TCOR is visible in real time. Leadership can benchmark, trend, and act — turning cost visibility into programme strategy.
Renewal arrives with fragmented loss data and no coherent risk narrative. Underwriters hold rate; brokers lack evidence to negotiate. Premiums rise year on year without clear justification.
Clean, trended loss data ready before the renewal window. A documented risk-improvement story goes to market. Underwriters see a managed programme. Rate pressure eases.
Risk data sits in 6+ platforms, none connected. Every report requires manual extraction and reconciliation. IT maintains integrations that constantly break. No single version of truth exists.
One platform replaces the patchwork. Incidents, claims, audits and policies in one place. Reporting is instant, IT overhead drops, decisions are made from one source.
Risk leaders are reactive by default. No connected leading indicators — near-misses, audit findings and inspection results live in silos. The next incident is invisible until it happens.
Leading indicators aggregated into a live risk profile. Patterns identified before they become events. Risk leaders move from explaining incidents to preventing them.
Proof points used in Discovery to earn the right to ask the questions.
The quantified business case, built with the customer.
Success defined together, owned through to going live.
Customer names anonymised to industry descriptors; outcomes retained.
| Pain we solve | Anonymised proof point (M1) |
|---|---|
| Total Cost of Risk | Industrial manufacturer — 50% YoY decrease in workers' comp claims + fewer reportable injuries (RMIS). Food & beverage distributor — 57% reduction in WC incurred amount over 6 months (EHS). |
| Claim Frequency | Food & beverage distributor — 57% reduction in WC incurred amount over 6 months. Industrial manufacturer — 50% YoY WC claims decrease. |
| Manual Data Entry | Global manufacturer — cut manual work by 50%, freeing time for strategic work (GRC). |
| Multiple Risk Platforms | Materials company — eliminated $40k spend via consolidation (RMIS). |
| Time to unified Risk Review | Global manufacturer — GRC workshops completed in half the time, 140 stakeholders across 120 risks. |
| Compliance Posture | Large municipality — 75% reduction in state penalties via automated reporting (RMIS). |
| Recordable Incident Rate | Food manufacturer — 50% reduction in TRIR. |
| High Severity Incident & Reputation | Hospitality group — $200k workers' comp claim savings (EHS). Food & beverage distributor — 57% reduction in WC incurred amount. |
| Insurance premiums | Municipality — $114k premium savings via analytics-based negotiation (RMIS). |
Premiums increased 12%, 9% and 14% over the last 3 renewals. Submissions built on incomplete, unverified loss data — no trend narrative, no demonstrated improvement. On a $1M annual premium base, that's $350,000 in avoidable premium growth over 3 years with no mechanism to change the trajectory.
Premiums trend down 10–15% as loss data is consolidated, trended, and presented as a verified improvement story. On a $1M base, a 12% reduction = $120,000 saved annually — and the $350,000 lost becomes the cost of inaction, not the new normal.
The key to Decision Criteria is two things: pro-activity and 3-dimensionality — across Technical, Economic and Relationship.
Select an M1 from research ahead of the meeting to open the door: “Typically, risk teams in your space see premiums creep up 8–15% at renewal — not because risk got worse, but because they couldn't show a clean data story. How does that land?” You don't have to be exactly right — it opens the door to being corrected and onto the M2 track.
Position the winning Decision Criteria proactively, ask for feedback and document them in your follow-up. Dc underpins your Champion's ability to defend your proposition when you're not in the room — and protects you against competition.
Build a Value Pyramid to strategically align with the business — from board-room context down to the obstacles and needs in their way. Run it to show up as professionals with a proactive point of view.
Your internal seller — power, influence, and a vested interest in your success. They sell for you when you aren't in the room. Champions are built, not found. Tested across all 3 traits: power & influence, willingness/ability to sell for you, and vested interest.
The ultimate decision-maker who controls the budget and has authority to sign. They have the power to say yes when others say no — and no when others say yes. Focused on risk mitigation, outcomes and commercial value over technical features.
Competition is any person, vendor or initiative competing for the same funds or resources — split into four categories: Rivals, Other Initiatives, Self-Build, Inertia. Every deal has a competitor — even if that competitor is “do nothing.”
Not just rivals — anything fighting for the same resources, including inertia.
No Champion, no deal — how does your Champion compare to the competition's?
Competitive differentiation lives in Decision Criteria — influence, document and lock in.
Competitor names anonymised; positioning retained.
| Category | Rival (anonymised) | Where they're strong | Where we win |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety / EHS | EHS incumbent · SMB | Pricing + product for chemical / LMS | NPS track record, EHS depth, service quality; one platform, one codebase |
| Safety / EHS | EHS platform · Mid / Ent | Breadth of offering, incident mgmt, brand awareness | Enterprise reputation, compliance, oil/gas/pharma; platform depth beyond light-touch |
| Risk / RMIS | AI-first claims platform | Claims-shop reputation; TPA/carrier/risk pools; AI-first | Deeper RMIS capabilities; foundational LLM vs. AI wrapper |
| Risk / RMIS | GRC-focused platform | GRC depth — competes on enterprise risk | Full RMIS breadth — the GRC player doesn't cover operational risk |
| Risk / RMIS | Low-cost RMIS · Gov / Canada | Low-cost player; government & Canadian market focus | Deeper RMIS + foundational LLM; broader ICP coverage |
| Risk + Safety | Integrated RMIS platform | Self-config ease of use; GRC as core | Integrated platform depth, customer service, ease of use; mobile UX on one codebase |
| Risk + Safety | Mid-market RMIS | Time to value; light implementations in low-end mid-market | Product-dev velocity; transparent pricing vs. big upcharge |
The second trait of a Champion is the ability and willingness to sell on your behalf — equipping them with a Champion deck is the most effective way. Ideally in their branding, covering pain, gain and unique decision criteria. V1 by the seller; V2 from the Champion's feedback. Not willing to work on it with you? That's qualification too.
When identifying your proposed EB, request a senior leader reach out early. The opening message is an introduction and an insight of value — no ask in return. Keep updating the proposed EB as the cycle progresses, so by the time you ask for engagement you've raised your chances (EB engaged = 52% higher win-rate).
When pain sounds the same for all stakeholders, you haven't gone far enough. Take the company-wide pain (all 3 levels) and personalise it to each stakeholder. Requesting their individual feedback demonstrates curiosity and builds rapport.
The “how” in which the customer is going to make their decision — the business process.
The series of steps that follow the Decision Process — from Decision to signature. The legal process.
Position best practice (who, what, when). Qualify history of buying similar solutions. NDA positioning.
Confirm who/what/when. Separate tech validation and RTS. Introductions to Legal/Finance requested. Implementation plan created.
Paper Process confirmed/triangulated. Engagement with Legal/Finance existing. Implementation plan locked in.
Three moves to uncover the process: ask about previous experiences (let your Champion story-tell how prior buying journeys took place), get articulation of how decisions get made (aligned to strategic goals), and ask for their version of the perfect process — what, who & when — then listen for gaps.
Replaces the seller-oriented “close plan”. It focuses on what the customer cares about — going live. Built to be flexible and accessible, with collaboration and built-in audit trails, it becomes a basecamp for all deal-related communication, living between you and your Champion. A Champion actively engaged with the Go-Live Plan is a great signal.
Ensures efficient, effective completion of the mutual evaluation — navigating the process of buying your solution and the value going live. It lives between you and your Champion; active engagement is a great signal.
We've all had a deal slip because we didn't anticipate a step, overlooked a stakeholder, or engaged Legal too late. Story-telling how this happened before opens willingness to collaborate on uncovering what's required. Professional sellers, not buyers.
A recurring slot where you and your Champion talk through deal progress, with the Go-Live Plan as the basis. A Champion committing to a weekly cadence is a great qualification signal and a powerful mechanism to keep the deal on track.
What good looks like for each element, mapped to the stages of the sales process. This is the backbone leaders coach against.
| Element | Qualification | Needs Analysis | Evaluation | Selected | Negotiation | Closed Won |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metrics | Introduce M1 stories to prompt spec sharing | Build M2 | Present M2 ROI vs. qualification cost | Use M2 to defend pricing | Track initial order against M3 (goal) | Owns the journey to M3 — vested interest |
| Economic Buyer | Map org chart; identify proposed EB | Understand EB goals; let Champion coach | Multi-thread to unlock EB engagement | EB GO for initial order vs. proposed pricing/eDc | EB exposure to initial outcome | EB GO for expansion |
| Decision Criteria | Probe winning Dc | Surround M2 with winning Dc | Lock in Dc against Pain/Gain | Ensure 3-dimensional to prevent price battle | Outcomes connected back to Dc as dependencies | Dc documented for expansion |
| Decision Process | Uncover via incumbent buying history | Validate DP connects to Champion's vested interest | Track progress via GLP | Ensure it extends and is documented for expansion | — | Covered in GLP, too |
| Implicate Pain | Uncover surface pain (i1) | Clarity on how pain measures (i2) | Drive implication (i3) at company level | Drive urgency, personalised per stakeholder | Validate pain vs. gain | i3 at scale to drive expansion urgency |
| Champion | Identify proposed Champion | Build / test — engagement & feedback | Co-build proposition; access to info & stakeholders | Guides through Decision Process — qualifies on all 3 traits | Pro-actively pulls through Paper Process | Monitor for migration sabotage; document for upsell |
| Competition | Identify incumbent or inertia | Champion coaching on how to win | Competitive differentiation locked in via Dc | — | Outcomes vs. competition articulated | Document for future renewals |
| Paper Process | Uncover via buying history; ensure NDA | Validate DP to signature | Lock in SLAs, pricing, quality | Share onboarding comms in MEDDPICC language | — | Map M3 progress for sign-off / expansion |
The standard the Blueprint sets, expressed as a Red / Amber / Green scale per element. This is what surfaces in your CRM and what leaders coach against.
“Repetition is the mother of learning, the father of action — which makes it the architect of accomplishment.” Click any month to see the theme, the seller activity, and the manager activity. Tick it off as you run it.
Enablement teaches at a theoretical level. Context-based coaching is the accelerator. People change behaviour based on what gets inspected — and where clear, actionable feedback is given.
Four real-world context lenses where coaching happens.
Preparation goes out beforehand. Go deep on gaps, lock down actions with a clear what, who and when — and ensure MEDDPICC language is used.
Converse about a single MEDDPICC element that stands out as a challenge, grounded in real-life context.
Inspect required MEDDPICC coverage, aligned to your sales stages. Stage- and process-based.
Pressure-test advanced deals against MEDDPICC to improve predictability — and early-mid cycle deals for cautiousness.
For Sr Leadership & Enablement, observation and feedback become a flywheel that levels up how your frontline leaders use MEDDPICC — and their overall effectiveness as leaders.
MEDDPICC in use, in real cadences. Attend or listen to a recorded call — one team or leader, per week.
Result: clear, actionable insights to feed back to call participants.
Make stakeholders aware of something they can't see yet. Share clear feedback and confirm it's received — written follow-up recommended.
Result: an agreed improvement, with a when.
Verify execution. Re-coach if missed. The behaviour repeats under inspection.
Result: a new behaviour → newly formed habits.
Systems aren't the holy grail — but they're vital to unlocking the initiative. When systems are in tune with observing and executing best practice, you get data-driven, best-practice behaviour.
Empower MEDDPICC adoption rather than adding manual workload. Open text fields alone won't cut it.
Dedicated opportunity-level fields. Give clear guidance, pull from a database, integrate with other tech — avoid 100% manual entry.
The Blueprint informs what's required per stage. Work with RevOps so gaps and opportunity health are obvious in the system.
Bridge CRM and selling resources (Go-live plans, Champion decks). Set the standard for where resources live and how they flow back centrally.
Score MEDDPICC elements across the board. Start with Champion & Metrics, then Economic Buyer — watch it evolve QoQ.
Capture real conversations for real-world context — and eradicate manual data entry.
Conversations captured in MEDDPICC context in real time, into your system of record. Users correct where needed.
The best deal reviews come from preparation. Automate much of it and raise the standard.
From patterns and observed conversations, surface actionable, specific insights.
The Blueprint captures what good looks like per stage and element — integrate it so the system suggests next actions too.
You can't improve what you don't measure. Where is your team today? Pick a stage to see what it looks like, the leading indicators to watch, and the risk to avoid.
Leading indicators (coaching cadence held, field completeness, call-tag volume) tell you whether the system is running. Lagging indicators (win rate, cycle length, forecast accuracy, slip rate) tell you whether it's working. Track both, every quarter, and report them together — cause and effect.
Your rhythm, codified. Run this and the Blueprint stays sharp. Drop it and adoption decays in 90 days. Tick items off — your progress is saved in this browser.
Enablement & Revenue Leadership typically run these sessions — optionally with the MEDDICC team as an additional service. Tell us where you are and we'll help you build the rhythm.
No forms — you're already known in mOS. One click reaches the MEDDICC team.